Latest topics
Links to Affiliates and Resources
American 99ers UnionDisplaced American Workers United
Tier 5 Extension Needed!!!
HelpThe99ers.com/
Outsaurus
Extend Unemployment Benefits
Help the 99ers on blogspot
Layoff List
99ers Facebook Page
Philadelphia Unemployment Project
Reach Out Job Search
Unemployed/Organized for the 21st Century
Unemployed Workers.org.
Examiner.com Denver
99ers.net/
Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Page 1 of 8 • Share •
Page 1 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 
Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
FIRST PLEASE READ THE ARTICLE BELOW. IT IS NOT ONLY FOR PENNSYLVANIANS BUT FOR MOST STATES. THEN READ THIS - Please contact Governor Corbett at PA.gov and PA Dept. of L&I's Minority Chair, Senator Christine Tartaglione at her website http://www.senatortartaglione.com/ and plead with them to enact legislation to extend Extended Benefits (EB) ASAP. If anyone can put together a general letter and post it, please do. We are likely to lose EB by May 20th but I do not know what the deadline is for applying to the Federal Government for the Extended Benefits (EB). Remember Pennsylvania is a RED state (Republican Governor) and not likely to want to extend these "free" Federal funds (nuts ain't it). Also any other legislators which you can list from PA, please do and give us their contact information. We must fax, call and email now. We don't have much time and remember THEY SCREWED US OUT OF TIER 4 AND POSSIBLY EB BY TRADING TAX CUTS TO THE RICH FOR AN UNEMPLOYMENT EXTENSION OF 13 MONTHS. HAD WE KNOWN MOST OF US WOULD LOSE EB BY THE MIDDLE OF JULY, WE WOULD HAVE SPIT ON THAT DEAL. AS IT IS TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH ARE NOW PAID FOR BY CUTTING EB. SO PLEASE GET TO IT, WE NEED YOUr HELP. ALSO, PLEASE CHECK YOUR OWN STATE NOW, THEY ARE BEING VERY QUIET ABOUT THIS. MAKES ME WONDER
PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE
On April - 2 - 2011 References at bottom
As more get jobs, those who haven't lose benefits.
The prognosticators are optimistic to the max when it comes to the nations employment situation, as they expect the U.S. Labor Department to report Friday morning that the nations employment expanded by 180,000 to 200,000 in March."Businesses are hiring, and with layoffs being minimal, it appears that the labor market is indeed getting better," said Joel L. Naroff, of Naroff Economics in Bucks County.That optimism scares Sharon Dietrich, a community legal-service lawyer who has long been one of the chief advocates for the unemployed in Pennsylvania.She is concerned because, even if the job market is starting to blossom, 90,000 unemployed Pennsylvanians could soon find themselves ineligible for part of their jobless benefits. That is about one in six of the states unemployed.The first 45,000 will lose their benefits for six weeks, starting Saturday."People without jobs will be even more out of [the publics] mind as the unemployment rate declines and economic optimism increases," Dietrich said."But the statewide unemployment rate is still 8 percent, and thousands of jobless people remain as desperate as if it were the middle of the recession," she said.For technical reasons, the benefits problem is more likely to affect unemployed Pennsylvanians than the jobless in New Jersey and Delaware.And now, a primer on unemployment benefits:In all three states, as in most states, the newly unemployed begin by receiving 26 weeks of state-funded unemployment benefits. Since the recession began in December 2007, the federal government has funded an additional 53 weeks worth of payments, broken up into segments.The last six weeks of the 53 are known as tier four, which are designed to phase out as a states average three-month unemployment rate falls below 8.5 percent.With a 9.2 percent unemployment rate, New Jerseys labor market is still tough enough so its jobless qualify for those six weeks. Delawares rate also qualifies.But Pennsylvanias three-month average just dropped below 8.5 percent, warranting the end of the tier-four benefits.After the regular state and emergency federal benefits run out, there is still one more set of benefits for the long-term unemployed – a 20-week block known as Extended Benefits, now funded by the federal government.These, too, are designed to phase out, state by state, as conditions improve. So, how is improvement measured? The long-standing formula compares a states average unemployment rate for the most recent three months with the same period in 2009. If it is 10 percent higher now, the benefits stay. If not, they vanish.But heres the scenario. In 2009, the unemployment rate was worsening. Now its improving. That means the gap between the two years is narrowing, so it is more likely that those benefits will go away.Pennsylvania will likely reach that point by May 20, with all extended benefits coming to an end as of June 11, the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry projects. The department estimates that 45,000 jobless will be cut off at some point during the 20 weeks.But many more will be affected because they will not receive any of the 20 weeks of benefits after they use up their earlier payments.To cope with this situation at a time when 13.6 million Americans are unemployed, Congress changed the "look back" to three years, comparing 2011 to 2008.But there is a catch. Each state has to agree. Delaware already has, and a bill is awaiting Gov. Christies signature in New Jersey. No word from his office on his plans.In Pennsylvania, there is no pending legislation. Sen. Christine Tartaglione (D., Phila.), the minority leader of the state Senates labor and industry committee, plans to introduce a measure early in April."We are in the situation now, where state legislators are convening and they have to get to this st, before their state triggers off" the extended benefits, said Maurice Emsellem, who monitors the issue for the National Employment Law Project, a national advocacy group."Once you trigger off, you are off for 13 weeks," he said.Potential opponents to Tartagliones measure include large employers and municipalities such as the City of Philadelphia that fund unemployment benefits themselves and do not tap into the statewide unemployment insurance fund.For John Di Ciurcio, the issue is now moot: He was laid off as a help-desk specialist in April 2009, and he exhausted all state and federal benefits two weeks ago. But he cannot imagine why support for the unemployed would diminish now."They are saying the economy is coming back, but jobs are the last to come back," he said. "Maybe those benefits will buy you a little time to hopefully get a job."
http://www.lenely.com/as-more-get-jobs-those-who-havent-ce-benefits-losemployment-l/
and
http://articles.philly.com/2011-04-01/news/29370840_1_unemployment-rate-unemployment-benefits-extended-benefits/2[i][u]
PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE
On April - 2 - 2011 References at bottom
As more get jobs, those who haven't lose benefits.
The prognosticators are optimistic to the max when it comes to the nations employment situation, as they expect the U.S. Labor Department to report Friday morning that the nations employment expanded by 180,000 to 200,000 in March."Businesses are hiring, and with layoffs being minimal, it appears that the labor market is indeed getting better," said Joel L. Naroff, of Naroff Economics in Bucks County.That optimism scares Sharon Dietrich, a community legal-service lawyer who has long been one of the chief advocates for the unemployed in Pennsylvania.She is concerned because, even if the job market is starting to blossom, 90,000 unemployed Pennsylvanians could soon find themselves ineligible for part of their jobless benefits. That is about one in six of the states unemployed.The first 45,000 will lose their benefits for six weeks, starting Saturday."People without jobs will be even more out of [the publics] mind as the unemployment rate declines and economic optimism increases," Dietrich said."But the statewide unemployment rate is still 8 percent, and thousands of jobless people remain as desperate as if it were the middle of the recession," she said.For technical reasons, the benefits problem is more likely to affect unemployed Pennsylvanians than the jobless in New Jersey and Delaware.And now, a primer on unemployment benefits:In all three states, as in most states, the newly unemployed begin by receiving 26 weeks of state-funded unemployment benefits. Since the recession began in December 2007, the federal government has funded an additional 53 weeks worth of payments, broken up into segments.The last six weeks of the 53 are known as tier four, which are designed to phase out as a states average three-month unemployment rate falls below 8.5 percent.With a 9.2 percent unemployment rate, New Jerseys labor market is still tough enough so its jobless qualify for those six weeks. Delawares rate also qualifies.But Pennsylvanias three-month average just dropped below 8.5 percent, warranting the end of the tier-four benefits.After the regular state and emergency federal benefits run out, there is still one more set of benefits for the long-term unemployed – a 20-week block known as Extended Benefits, now funded by the federal government.These, too, are designed to phase out, state by state, as conditions improve. So, how is improvement measured? The long-standing formula compares a states average unemployment rate for the most recent three months with the same period in 2009. If it is 10 percent higher now, the benefits stay. If not, they vanish.But heres the scenario. In 2009, the unemployment rate was worsening. Now its improving. That means the gap between the two years is narrowing, so it is more likely that those benefits will go away.Pennsylvania will likely reach that point by May 20, with all extended benefits coming to an end as of June 11, the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry projects. The department estimates that 45,000 jobless will be cut off at some point during the 20 weeks.But many more will be affected because they will not receive any of the 20 weeks of benefits after they use up their earlier payments.To cope with this situation at a time when 13.6 million Americans are unemployed, Congress changed the "look back" to three years, comparing 2011 to 2008.But there is a catch. Each state has to agree. Delaware already has, and a bill is awaiting Gov. Christies signature in New Jersey. No word from his office on his plans.In Pennsylvania, there is no pending legislation. Sen. Christine Tartaglione (D., Phila.), the minority leader of the state Senates labor and industry committee, plans to introduce a measure early in April."We are in the situation now, where state legislators are convening and they have to get to this st, before their state triggers off" the extended benefits, said Maurice Emsellem, who monitors the issue for the National Employment Law Project, a national advocacy group."Once you trigger off, you are off for 13 weeks," he said.Potential opponents to Tartagliones measure include large employers and municipalities such as the City of Philadelphia that fund unemployment benefits themselves and do not tap into the statewide unemployment insurance fund.For John Di Ciurcio, the issue is now moot: He was laid off as a help-desk specialist in April 2009, and he exhausted all state and federal benefits two weeks ago. But he cannot imagine why support for the unemployed would diminish now."They are saying the economy is coming back, but jobs are the last to come back," he said. "Maybe those benefits will buy you a little time to hopefully get a job."
http://www.lenely.com/as-more-get-jobs-those-who-havent-ce-benefits-losemployment-l/
and
http://articles.philly.com/2011-04-01/news/29370840_1_unemployment-rate-unemployment-benefits-extended-benefits/2[i][u]

Dazed&Confused- Member
- Posts: 347
Join date: 2011-02-22
Location: Philadelphia
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Thanks, Dazed&Confused. I didn't realize this was happening. I'm going to the recently formed PA Wants to Work steering comittee meeting today, and I'm going to forward this article to all of these folks to see if they are aware of this.
And of course I will do the usual phone calls, e-mails, etc..
And of course I will do the usual phone calls, e-mails, etc..

JoanB- Member
- Posts: 486
Join date: 2011-03-01
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
This is unbelievable! It will eventually affect 90,000 people. What are these people supposed to do? With a number of states doing this now, I am very curious about how they are going to calculate the National Unemployment Rate going forward. Will the BLS take into consideration all the people who will lose EB in the states that are eliminating it, or will they define them as "discouraged workers" who have given up? If they do the latter, the unemployment rate is going to take a huge plunge in the next few months, even though millions more are added to the rank of "exhaustees".
_________________
“Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it.” ~ John Lennon

DesperateInRI- Administrator

- Posts: 7590
Join date: 2011-02-16
Age: 55
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Update: just called Sen. Tartaglione's office and her nice staffer said that the senator is going to introduce her legislation tomorrow or maybe early next week. My senator (Ferlo) is sure to support it, but I will call and e-mail any way.
And I'll report back from the PA Wants to Work meeting today.
And I'll report back from the PA Wants to Work meeting today.

JoanB- Member
- Posts: 486
Join date: 2011-03-01
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
JoanB wrote:Thanks, Dazed&Confused. I didn't realize this was happening. I'm going to the recently formed PA Wants to Work steering comittee meeting today, and I'm going to forward this article to all of these folks to see if they are aware of this.
And of course I will do the usual phone calls, e-mails, etc..
Thank you Joan, it is really scary. Do pass it around and occasionally bump the thread so we do not get stuck like NC who tired to blame it on the Feds when it was really the state doing the maneuvering.
All states need to take note of this for their own sake, please read this.

Dazed&Confused- Member
- Posts: 347
Join date: 2011-02-22
Location: Philadelphia
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
JoanB wrote:Update: just called Sen. Tartaglione's office and her nice staffer said that the senator is going to introduce her legislation tomorrow or maybe early next week. My senator (Ferlo) is sure to support it, but I will call and e-mail any way.
And I'll report back from the PA Wants to Work meeting today.
Thank you so much Joan. I have emailed her quite a few times with no response. I know she is busy. Glad to hear this and looking forward to hearing back about you PA wants to work meeting. Remember one thing, PA has a disproportionate (I can believe I spelled that right) number of Boners as opposed to Democrats. Gotta love you.

Dazed&Confused- Member
- Posts: 347
Join date: 2011-02-22
Location: Philadelphia
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Dazed&Confused wrote:JoanB wrote:Update: just called Sen. Tartaglione's office and her nice staffer said that the senator is going to introduce her legislation tomorrow or maybe early next week. My senator (Ferlo) is sure to support it, but I will call and e-mail any way.
And I'll report back from the PA Wants to Work meeting today.
Thank you so much Joan. I have emailed her quite a few times with no response. I know she is busy. Glad to hear this and looking forward to hearing back about you PA wants to work meeting. Remember one thing, PA has a disproportionate (I can believe I spelled that right) number of Boners as opposed to Democrats. Gotta love you.
Thank you, Dazed. I wouldn't have known about it if not for your post. You have redirect our focus for right now. We're going to explore several ideas around calling and lobbying efforts because of you. I'll know more in a few days and will keep you updated.

JoanB- Member
- Posts: 486
Join date: 2011-03-01
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Thanks Penguin gal, you got a great slap shot, yes you do, I can tell you'd make a great Flyers Fan if you were born here. Now be nice, lol Dazed

Dazed&Confused- Member
- Posts: 347
Join date: 2011-02-22
Location: Philadelphia
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
DesperateInRI wrote:This is unbelievable! It will eventually affect 90,000 people. What are these people supposed to do? With a number of states doing this now, I am very curious about how they are going to calculate the National Unemployment Rate going forward. Will the BLS take into consideration all the people who will lose EB in the states that are eliminating it, or will they define them as "discouraged workers" who have given up? If they do the latter, the unemployment rate is going to take a huge plunge in the next few months, even though millions more are added to the rank of "exhaustees".
Babe, can I call you that? I think that was the whole point of the December 2010 deal. They knew what was going to happen, you know they are smarter than us and live high and don't care. Well maybe they are not smarter than us. Dazed&Confused

Dazed&Confused- Member
- Posts: 347
Join date: 2011-02-22
Location: Philadelphia
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
This is truly going to be a mess and send financial waves throughout the country if all these Republican Governors can Eb, it ain't gonna be nice.
There are no jobs, don't they get it! They have screwed the American Dream for our children and grandchildren, but fixed it for their children and grandchildren. Ain't that nice.
There are no jobs, don't they get it! They have screwed the American Dream for our children and grandchildren, but fixed it for their children and grandchildren. Ain't that nice.

Dazed&Confused- Member
- Posts: 347
Join date: 2011-02-22
Location: Philadelphia
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Update (minor) called my senator's (Ferlo) office. They knew nothing about this, but I sent them your link. The staffer I talked to said that he would call me back--seemed to be suggesting that they were having a meeting or something this morning and that he would bring this up.
I'm going to call my state rep now(Frankel).
You should try calling Sen. Tartaglione. I find calling much more satisfying than any other mode, but that's just me.
I can't believe the Republicans are gonna vote against this (the article didn't say that, but you know they will). What a bunch of ass hats.
I'm going to call my state rep now(Frankel).
You should try calling Sen. Tartaglione. I find calling much more satisfying than any other mode, but that's just me.
I can't believe the Republicans are gonna vote against this (the article didn't say that, but you know they will). What a bunch of ass hats.

JoanB- Member
- Posts: 486
Join date: 2011-03-01
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Okay. So I have just called the Senators office in Philadelphia.The young woman told me to call Amanda in Harrisburg since everyone who would know anything was out to lunch. I called Amanda in Harrisburg and she put me through to speak with Sherry in Harrisburg (717) 787-1141. I explained I wanted to know if the Senator was working on legislation to get Extended Benefits based on a three-year look back. She told me yes they were working on it, they would then have to get some supporters of the bill, it would then get a print #. After that they would vote on it and if they get enough votes, and I think they will if we write/fax/email every PA legislator we can, it will pass and go to the Governor for his signature in short order.. That was right out of the Harrisburg office. So lets get moving on the legislators, names and email, phone #'s. I am so tired, I have to get some sleep now.
Told the young woman Sherry from the Senators Harrisburg office that she would probably be getting some phone calls so start calling. Dazed&Confused
Told the young woman Sherry from the Senators Harrisburg office that she would probably be getting some phone calls so start calling. Dazed&Confused

Dazed&Confused- Member
- Posts: 347
Join date: 2011-02-22
Location: Philadelphia
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Joan, if necessary will you meet me in Harrisburg so we can picket?

Dazed&Confused- Member
- Posts: 347
Join date: 2011-02-22
Location: Philadelphia
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Good work calling the Senator's office, Dazed. Before calling all the PA senators though, I would wait for two reasons:
Here are the committe members:
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/cteeInfo/cteeInfo.cfm?cde=13&body=S
We have four Democrats on the committee. We don't even know yet if all of them will vote for this, so we have to find that out. So once Sen. Tartaglione introduces the bill, we can see that and then if they all do, we need to flip two Republicans. If not, we have to flip more. I'd rather just flip them the bird, but that's not how this works unfortunately.
- Since it hasn't been introduced yet, they are unlikely to know what you're talking about.
- The bill has to get out of committee (Labor & Industry) first before it can go to the floor for a vote.
Here are the committe members:
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/cteeInfo/cteeInfo.cfm?cde=13&body=S
We have four Democrats on the committee. We don't even know yet if all of them will vote for this, so we have to find that out. So once Sen. Tartaglione introduces the bill, we can see that and then if they all do, we need to flip two Republicans. If not, we have to flip more. I'd rather just flip them the bird, but that's not how this works unfortunately.

JoanB- Member
- Posts: 486
Join date: 2011-03-01
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
Dazed&Confused wrote:Joan, if necessary will you meet me in Harrisburg so we can picket?
![]()
Unless I get a job.

JoanB- Member
- Posts: 486
Join date: 2011-03-01
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Page 1 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 
Similar topics» Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
» ALERT & Action Plan, Please Read:Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
» Recent Graduates Not Only Move Back Home, But Stay There
» Michigan Unemployed may lose Extended Benefits
» You rage you lose!
» ALERT & Action Plan, Please Read:Pennsylvania will likely lose EB by May 20
» Recent Graduates Not Only Move Back Home, But Stay There
» Michigan Unemployed may lose Extended Benefits
» You rage you lose!
Page 1 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Forum Rules







» The Human Disaster of Unemployment
» Alternative Information on the Economy and the Future of the Country.
» Blast from the past
» unentended consequence Globalization??
» 1099 vs w-2 and minimum work weeks
» We are amazing, we are awesome!!!!!
» UFO 2.1 VIDEO JUKEBOX - Our Chords & Keys To Ascension
» I finally have a full-time job
» Bye bye unemployment benefits - Eight States to Stop Federal Benefits Program May 12
» UF2 Members Chat Thread: Part 3
» Paul LePage, Maine Governor, Tells Unemployed Americans To 'Get Off The Couch' And Get A Job
» If you need to laugh about being unemployed.
» Questions With Unemployments Additional Training Payments
» US Labor Department awards nearly $65.5 million to fund re-employment, eligibility assessments for UE in 40 states, PR and DC